Tag Archives: modernity

Twenty-seven years after dismissing Fight Club by its title, I finally watched it and discovered a psychological examination of identity, conformity, consumerism, and perception. In retrospect, an old question from others—“Have you seen Fight Club?”—now feels less like a movie recommendation and more like an invitation to notice what lies beneath the architecture of ordinary life.

A meditation on the freedom that comes when we stop performing for approval, rediscover our original curiosities, and distinguish what we truly want from what the world taught us to want.

As AI and automation make competence increasingly abundant, the real economic premium shifts toward judgment, taste, trust, meaning and genuine human attention. The changing restaurant industry offers a glimpse of a much larger transformation: technology may not eliminate the human experience—it may finally reveal what the human experience is worth.

The Point Defense Battle Lab may give Grand Forks an advantage larger than technology itself: the ability to turn experimentation into institutional memory, recognize emerging requirements earlier, reduce uncertainty faster, and build an ecosystem whose strategic value compounds through proximity, inference, and foresight.

Global warming deserves more than denial, alarmism, or political slogans. By separating ozone depletion, air pollution, greenhouse gases, and climate change, I examine what we actually know—and argue that humanity’s best environmental future lies not in retreating from technological progress, but in engineering something better.

There comes a point when making more money matters less than owning more of your own time. Real wealth may be the freedom to work, create, think, and earn without surrendering your days to someone else’s schedule.

Tolstoy’s War and Peace is more than a novel about Napoleon and Russia. It is an argument about history itself—about the distance between strategy and reality, the limits of individual control, and the dangerous human tendency to confuse the map with the mud.

America was never built on agreement. From the Founding Fathers forward, the American experiment has been an argument—often difficult, bitter, and unresolved. What made the Republic extraordinary was not consensus, but the creation of a constitutional system strong enough to contain disagreement without surrendering the country itself.